Vulnerabilities > Gnome > Gpdf
DATE | CVE | VULNERABILITY TITLE | RISK |
---|---|---|---|
2009-12-21 | CVE-2009-4035 | Code Injection vulnerability in multiple products The FoFiType1::parse function in fofi/FoFiType1.cc in Xpdf 3.0.0, gpdf 2.8.2, kpdf in kdegraphics 3.3.1, and possibly other libraries and versions, does not check the return value of the getNextLine function, which allows context-dependent attackers to execute arbitrary code via a PDF file with a crafted Type 1 font that can produce a negative value, leading to a signed-to-unsigned integer conversion error and a buffer overflow. | 9.3 |
2006-03-15 | CVE-2006-1244 | Multiple Unspecified vulnerability in XPDF Unspecified vulnerability in certain versions of xpdf after 3.00, as used in various products including (a) pdfkit.framework, (b) gpdf, (c) pdftohtml, and (d) libextractor, has unknown impact and user-assisted attack vectors, possibly involving errors in (1) gmem.c, (2) SplashXPathScanner.cc, (3) JBIG2Stream.cc, (4) JPXStream.cc, and/or (5) Stream.cc. | 7.6 |
2005-04-27 | CVE-2005-0206 | Integer Overflow vulnerability in Xpdf PDFTOPS The patch for integer overflow vulnerabilities in Xpdf 2.0 and 3.0 (CVE-2004-0888) is incomplete for 64-bit architectures on certain Linux distributions such as Red Hat, which could leave Xpdf users exposed to the original vulnerabilities. | 7.5 |
2005-01-27 | CVE-2004-0889 | Integer Overflow vulnerability in Xpdf PDFTOPS Multiple integer overflows in xpdf 3.0, and other packages that use xpdf code such as CUPS, allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code, a different set of vulnerabilities than those identified by CVE-2004-0888. | 10.0 |
2005-01-27 | CVE-2004-0888 | Integer Overflow vulnerability in Xpdf PDFTOPS Multiple integer overflows in xpdf 2.0 and 3.0, and other packages that use xpdf code such as CUPS, gpdf, and kdegraphics, allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code, a different set of vulnerabilities than those identified by CVE-2004-0889. | 10.0 |