Vulnerabilities > CVE-2014-0086 - Improper Input Validation vulnerability in Redhat Jboss web Framework KIT and Richfaces

047910
CVSS 4.3 - MEDIUM
Attack vector
NETWORK
Attack complexity
MEDIUM
Privileges required
NONE
Confidentiality impact
NONE
Integrity impact
NONE
Availability impact
PARTIAL

Summary

The doFilter function in webapp/PushHandlerFilter.java in JBoss RichFaces 4.3.4, 4.3.5, and 5.x allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption and out-of-memory error) via a large number of malformed atmosphere push requests.

Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE)

Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification (CAPEC)

  • Buffer Overflow via Environment Variables
    This attack pattern involves causing a buffer overflow through manipulation of environment variables. Once the attacker finds that they can modify an environment variable, they may try to overflow associated buffers. This attack leverages implicit trust often placed in environment variables.
  • Server Side Include (SSI) Injection
    An attacker can use Server Side Include (SSI) Injection to send code to a web application that then gets executed by the web server. Doing so enables the attacker to achieve similar results to Cross Site Scripting, viz., arbitrary code execution and information disclosure, albeit on a more limited scale, since the SSI directives are nowhere near as powerful as a full-fledged scripting language. Nonetheless, the attacker can conveniently gain access to sensitive files, such as password files, and execute shell commands.
  • Cross Zone Scripting
    An attacker is able to cause a victim to load content into their web-browser that bypasses security zone controls and gain access to increased privileges to execute scripting code or other web objects such as unsigned ActiveX controls or applets. This is a privilege elevation attack targeted at zone-based web-browser security. In a zone-based model, pages belong to one of a set of zones corresponding to the level of privilege assigned to that page. Pages in an untrusted zone would have a lesser level of access to the system and/or be restricted in the types of executable content it was allowed to invoke. In a cross-zone scripting attack, a page that should be assigned to a less privileged zone is granted the privileges of a more trusted zone. This can be accomplished by exploiting bugs in the browser, exploiting incorrect configuration in the zone controls, through a cross-site scripting attack that causes the attackers' content to be treated as coming from a more trusted page, or by leveraging some piece of system functionality that is accessible from both the trusted and less trusted zone. This attack differs from "Restful Privilege Escalation" in that the latter correlates to the inadequate securing of RESTful access methods (such as HTTP DELETE) on the server, while cross-zone scripting attacks the concept of security zones as implemented by a browser.
  • Cross Site Scripting through Log Files
    An attacker may leverage a system weakness where logs are susceptible to log injection to insert scripts into the system's logs. If these logs are later viewed by an administrator through a thin administrative interface and the log data is not properly HTML encoded before being written to the page, the attackers' scripts stored in the log will be executed in the administrative interface with potentially serious consequences. This attack pattern is really a combination of two other attack patterns: log injection and stored cross site scripting.
  • Command Line Execution through SQL Injection
    An attacker uses standard SQL injection methods to inject data into the command line for execution. This could be done directly through misuse of directives such as MSSQL_xp_cmdshell or indirectly through injection of data into the database that would be interpreted as shell commands. Sometime later, an unscrupulous backend application (or could be part of the functionality of the same application) fetches the injected data stored in the database and uses this data as command line arguments without performing proper validation. The malicious data escapes that data plane by spawning new commands to be executed on the host.

Redhat

advisories
rhsa
idRHSA-2014:0335

Seebug

  • bulletinFamilyexploit
    descriptionCVE ID:CVE-2014-0086 JBoss RichFaces是一个具 Ajax和JSF特性的Web框架。 JBoss RichFaces在处理PushHandlerFilter类(src/main/java/org/richfaces/webapp/PushHandlerFilter.java)中的推送事件时存在错误,允许远程攻击者利用漏洞发送特制的畸形推送请求消耗系统内存资源,造成拒绝服务攻击。 0 JBoss RichFaces 4.3.4 目前没有详细解决方案提供: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/RF-13250
    idSSV:61556
    last seen2017-11-19
    modified2014-02-25
    published2014-02-25
    reporterRoot
    titleJBoss RichFaces进行Push请求拒绝服务漏洞
  • bulletinFamilyexploit
    descriptionCVE(CAN) ID: CVE-2014-0086 JBoss RichFaces是一个具有Ajax和JSF特性的Web框架。 RichFaces没有正确过滤某些请求,未经身份验证的远程攻击者通过发送大量的畸形请求到使用Atmosphere框架的RichFaces应用,利用此漏洞导致应用服务器拒绝服务(大量的内存消耗)。 0 JBoss Group RichFaces 目前厂商还没有提供补丁或者升级程序,我们建议使用此软件的用户随时关注厂商的主页以获取最新版本: http://www.jboss.org/
    idSSV:61562
    last seen2017-11-19
    modified2014-02-26
    published2014-02-26
    reporterRoot
    titleJBoss RichFaces 'PushHandlerFilter.java'远程拒绝服务漏洞