Vulnerabilities > CVE-2013-3430 - Improper Authentication vulnerability in Cisco Video Surveillance Manager

047910
CVSS 9.0 - CRITICAL
Attack vector
NETWORK
Attack complexity
LOW
Privileges required
NONE
Confidentiality impact
COMPLETE
Integrity impact
PARTIAL
Availability impact
PARTIAL
network
low complexity
cisco
CWE-287
critical
nessus
exploit available

Summary

Cisco Video Surveillance Manager (VSM) before 7.0.0 allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive configuration, archive, and log information via unspecified vectors, related to the Cisco_VSBWT (aka Broadware sample code) package, aka Bug ID CSCsv37288.

Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE)

Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification (CAPEC)

  • Authentication Abuse
    An attacker obtains unauthorized access to an application, service or device either through knowledge of the inherent weaknesses of an authentication mechanism, or by exploiting a flaw in the authentication scheme's implementation. In such an attack an authentication mechanism is functioning but a carefully controlled sequence of events causes the mechanism to grant access to the attacker. This attack may exploit assumptions made by the target's authentication procedures, such as assumptions regarding trust relationships or assumptions regarding the generation of secret values. This attack differs from Authentication Bypass attacks in that Authentication Abuse allows the attacker to be certified as a valid user through illegitimate means, while Authentication Bypass allows the user to access protected material without ever being certified as an authenticated user. This attack does not rely on prior sessions established by successfully authenticating users, as relied upon for the "Exploitation of Session Variables, Resource IDs and other Trusted Credentials" attack patterns.
  • Exploiting Trust in Client (aka Make the Client Invisible)
    An attack of this type exploits a programs' vulnerabilities in client/server communication channel authentication and data integrity. It leverages the implicit trust a server places in the client, or more importantly, that which the server believes is the client. An attacker executes this type of attack by placing themselves in the communication channel between client and server such that communication directly to the server is possible where the server believes it is communicating only with a valid client. There are numerous variations of this type of attack.
  • Utilizing REST's Trust in the System Resource to Register Man in the Middle
    This attack utilizes a REST(REpresentational State Transfer)-style applications' trust in the system resources and environment to place man in the middle once SSL is terminated. Rest applications premise is that they leverage existing infrastructure to deliver web services functionality. An example of this is a Rest application that uses HTTP Get methods and receives a HTTP response with an XML document. These Rest style web services are deployed on existing infrastructure such as Apache and IIS web servers with no SOAP stack required. Unfortunately from a security standpoint, there frequently is no interoperable identity security mechanism deployed, so Rest developers often fall back to SSL to deliver security. In large data centers, SSL is typically terminated at the edge of the network - at the firewall, load balancer, or router. Once the SSL is terminated the HTTP request is in the clear (unless developers have hashed or encrypted the values, but this is rare). The attacker can utilize a sniffer such as Wireshark to snapshot the credentials, such as username and password that are passed in the clear once SSL is terminated. Once the attacker gathers these credentials, they can submit requests to the web service provider just as authorized user do. There is not typically an authentication on the client side, beyond what is passed in the request itself so once this is compromised, then this is generally sufficient to compromise the service's authentication scheme.
  • Man in the Middle Attack
    This type of attack targets the communication between two components (typically client and server). The attacker places himself in the communication channel between the two components. Whenever one component attempts to communicate with the other (data flow, authentication challenges, etc.), the data first goes to the attacker, who has the opportunity to observe or alter it, and it is then passed on to the other component as if it was never intercepted. This interposition is transparent leaving the two compromised components unaware of the potential corruption or leakage of their communications. The potential for Man-in-the-Middle attacks yields an implicit lack of trust in communication or identify between two components.

Exploit-Db

descriptionCisco Video Surveillance Operations Manager 6.3.2 - Multiple vulnerabilities. CVE-2013-3429,CVE-2013-3430,CVE-2013-3431. Webapps exploit for jsp platform
idEDB-ID:24786
last seen2016-02-03
modified2013-03-15
published2013-03-15
reporterBassem
sourcehttps://www.exploit-db.com/download/24786/
titleCisco Video Surveillance Operations Manager 6.3.2 - Multiple vulnerabilities

Nessus

NASL familyCISCO
NASL idCISCO-SA-20130724-VSM.NASL
descriptionAccording to its self-reported version, the version of Cisco Video Surveillance Manager installed on the remote host is affected by multiple vulnerabilities : - The application is affected by a directory traversal vulnerability because Cisco VSM does not properly validate user-supplied input to the
last seen2020-06-01
modified2020-06-02
plugin id69856
published2013-09-12
reporterThis script is Copyright (C) 2013-2019 and is owned by Tenable, Inc. or an Affiliate thereof.
sourcehttps://www.tenable.com/plugins/nessus/69856
titleCisco Video Surveillance Manager Multiple Vulnerabilities (cisco-sa-20130724-vsm)
code
#
# (C) Tenable Network Security, Inc.
#

include("compat.inc");

if (description)
{
  script_id(69856);
  script_version("1.7");
  script_cvs_date("Date: 2019/03/27 13:17:50");

  script_cve_id("CVE-2013-3429", "CVE-2013-3430", "CVE-2013-3431");
  script_bugtraq_id(61430, 61431, 61432);
  script_xref(name:"CISCO-SA", value:"cisco-sa-20130724-vsm");

  script_name(english:"Cisco Video Surveillance Manager Multiple Vulnerabilities (cisco-sa-20130724-vsm)");
  script_summary(english:"Checks VSM version");

  script_set_attribute(
    attribute:"synopsis",
    value:"The remote host is missing a vendor-supplied security patch."
  );
  script_set_attribute(
    attribute:"description",
    value:
"According to its self-reported version, the version of Cisco Video
Surveillance Manager installed on the remote host is affected by
multiple vulnerabilities :

  - The application is affected by a directory traversal
    vulnerability because Cisco VSM does not properly
    validate user-supplied input to the
    'monitor/logselect.php' and 'read_log.jsp' scripts.
    This can allow a remote, unauthorized attacker to gain
    access to arbitrary files on the remote host by sending
    a specially crafted request. (CVE-2013-3429)

  - The application allows access to sensitive data without
    requiring authentication.  Data such as configuration,
    monitoring pages archives, and system logs can be
    accessed by attackers without requiring authentication.
    (CVE-2013-3430, CVE-2013-3431)"
  );
  # https://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20130724-vsm
  script_set_attribute(attribute:"see_also", value:"http://www.nessus.org/u?face9c20");
  script_set_attribute(attribute:"solution", value:"Upgrade to Cisco Video Surveillance Manager 7.0.0 or later.");
  script_set_cvss_base_vector("CVSS2#AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:P/A:P");
  script_set_cvss_temporal_vector("CVSS2#E:POC/RL:OF/RC:C");
  script_set_cvss3_base_vector("CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L");
  script_set_cvss3_temporal_vector("CVSS:3.0/E:P/RL:O/RC:C");
  script_set_attribute(attribute:"cvss_score_source", value:"CVE-2013-3430");
  script_set_attribute(attribute:"exploitability_ease", value:"Exploits are available");
  script_set_attribute(attribute:"exploit_available", value:"true");

  script_set_attribute(attribute:"vuln_publication_date", value:"2013/03/13");
  script_set_attribute(attribute:"patch_publication_date", value:"2013/07/24");
  script_set_attribute(attribute:"plugin_publication_date", value:"2013/09/12");

  script_set_attribute(attribute:"plugin_type", value:"remote");
  script_set_attribute(attribute:"cpe", value:"cpe:/a:cisco:video_surveillance_manager");
  script_end_attributes();

  script_category(ACT_GATHER_INFO);
  script_family(english:"CISCO");

  script_copyright(english:"This script is Copyright (C) 2013-2019 and is owned by Tenable, Inc. or an Affiliate thereof.");

  script_dependencies("cisco_vsm_detect.nasl");
  script_require_ports("Services/www", 80);
  script_require_keys("installed_sw/Cisco Video Surveillance Management Console");

  exit(0);
}

include("vcf.inc");
include("http.inc");

port = get_http_port(default:80);
app = "Cisco Video Surveillance Management Console";

app_info = vcf::get_app_info(app:app, port:port, webapp:true);

vcf::check_granularity(app_info:app_info, sig_segments:2);

constraints = [
  { "fixed_version" : "7.0.0" },
];

vcf::check_version_and_report(app_info:app_info, constraints:constraints, severity:SECURITY_HOLE);

The Hacker News

idTHN:B558B0C3A7F0751B780E63B57717C3F4
last seen2019-08-01
modified2019-08-01
published2019-08-01
reporterThe Hacker News
sourcehttps://thehackernews.com/2019/08/cisco-surveillance-technology.html
titleCisco ‘Knowingly’ Sold Hackable Video Surveillance System to U.S. Government