Vulnerabilities > CVE-2011-2535 - Improper Input Validation vulnerability in Digium Asterisk

047910
CVSS 5.0 - MEDIUM
Attack vector
NETWORK
Attack complexity
LOW
Privileges required
NONE
Confidentiality impact
NONE
Integrity impact
NONE
Availability impact
PARTIAL
network
low complexity
digium
CWE-20
nessus

Summary

chan_iax2.c in the IAX2 channel driver in Asterisk Open Source 1.4.x before 1.4.41.1, 1.6.2.x before 1.6.2.18.1, and 1.8.x before 1.8.4.3, and Asterisk Business Edition C.3 before C.3.7.3, accesses a memory address contained in an option control frame, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon crash) or possibly have unspecified other impact via a crafted frame.

Vulnerable Configurations

Part Description Count
Application
Digium
195

Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE)

Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification (CAPEC)

  • Buffer Overflow via Environment Variables
    This attack pattern involves causing a buffer overflow through manipulation of environment variables. Once the attacker finds that they can modify an environment variable, they may try to overflow associated buffers. This attack leverages implicit trust often placed in environment variables.
  • Server Side Include (SSI) Injection
    An attacker can use Server Side Include (SSI) Injection to send code to a web application that then gets executed by the web server. Doing so enables the attacker to achieve similar results to Cross Site Scripting, viz., arbitrary code execution and information disclosure, albeit on a more limited scale, since the SSI directives are nowhere near as powerful as a full-fledged scripting language. Nonetheless, the attacker can conveniently gain access to sensitive files, such as password files, and execute shell commands.
  • Cross Zone Scripting
    An attacker is able to cause a victim to load content into their web-browser that bypasses security zone controls and gain access to increased privileges to execute scripting code or other web objects such as unsigned ActiveX controls or applets. This is a privilege elevation attack targeted at zone-based web-browser security. In a zone-based model, pages belong to one of a set of zones corresponding to the level of privilege assigned to that page. Pages in an untrusted zone would have a lesser level of access to the system and/or be restricted in the types of executable content it was allowed to invoke. In a cross-zone scripting attack, a page that should be assigned to a less privileged zone is granted the privileges of a more trusted zone. This can be accomplished by exploiting bugs in the browser, exploiting incorrect configuration in the zone controls, through a cross-site scripting attack that causes the attackers' content to be treated as coming from a more trusted page, or by leveraging some piece of system functionality that is accessible from both the trusted and less trusted zone. This attack differs from "Restful Privilege Escalation" in that the latter correlates to the inadequate securing of RESTful access methods (such as HTTP DELETE) on the server, while cross-zone scripting attacks the concept of security zones as implemented by a browser.
  • Cross Site Scripting through Log Files
    An attacker may leverage a system weakness where logs are susceptible to log injection to insert scripts into the system's logs. If these logs are later viewed by an administrator through a thin administrative interface and the log data is not properly HTML encoded before being written to the page, the attackers' scripts stored in the log will be executed in the administrative interface with potentially serious consequences. This attack pattern is really a combination of two other attack patterns: log injection and stored cross site scripting.
  • Command Line Execution through SQL Injection
    An attacker uses standard SQL injection methods to inject data into the command line for execution. This could be done directly through misuse of directives such as MSSQL_xp_cmdshell or indirectly through injection of data into the database that would be interpreted as shell commands. Sometime later, an unscrupulous backend application (or could be part of the functionality of the same application) fetches the injected data stored in the database and uses this data as command line arguments without performing proper validation. The malicious data escapes that data plane by spawning new commands to be executed on the host.

Nessus

  • NASL familyDenial of Service
    NASL idASTERISK_AST_2011_010.NASL
    descriptionAccording to the version in its SIP banner, the version of Asterisk running on the remote host is potentially affected by multiple denial of service vulnerabilities : - If a remote user sends a SIP packet with a NULL, Asterisk reads data past the NULL even though the buffer is actually truncated when copied, which could lead to an application crash. (AST-2011-008) - A remote user sending a SIP packet containing a Contact header with a missing left angle bracket causes Asterisk to access a NULL pointer, which could cause the application to crash. (AST-2011-009) - A memory address can be inadvertently transmitted over the network via IAX2 via an option control frame, which would cause the remote party to try to access it. (AST-2011-010)
    last seen2020-06-01
    modified2020-06-02
    plugin id55457
    published2011-06-29
    reporterThis script is Copyright (C) 2011-2018 Tenable Network Security, Inc.
    sourcehttps://www.tenable.com/plugins/nessus/55457
    titleAsterisk Multiple Channel Drivers Denial of Service (AST-2011-008 / AST-2011-009 / AST-2011-010)
  • NASL familyGentoo Local Security Checks
    NASL idGENTOO_GLSA-201110-21.NASL
    descriptionThe remote host is affected by the vulnerability described in GLSA-201110-21 (Asterisk: Multiple vulnerabilities) Multiple vulnerabilities have been discovered in Asterisk. Please review the CVE identifiers referenced below for details. Impact : An unauthenticated remote attacker may execute code with the privileges of the Asterisk process or cause a Denial of Service. Workaround : There is no known workaround at this time.
    last seen2020-06-01
    modified2020-06-02
    plugin id56625
    published2011-10-25
    reporterThis script is Copyright (C) 2011-2018 Tenable Network Security, Inc.
    sourcehttps://www.tenable.com/plugins/nessus/56625
    titleGLSA-201110-21 : Asterisk: Multiple vulnerabilities
  • NASL familyFreeBSD Local Security Checks
    NASL idFREEBSD_PKG_40544E8C9F7B11E09BEC6C626DD55A41.NASL
    descriptionThe Asterisk Development Team reports : AST-2011-008: If a remote user sends a SIP packet containing a NULL, Asterisk assumes available data extends past the null to the end of the packet when the buffer is actually truncated when copied. This causes SIP header parsing to modify data past the end of the buffer altering unrelated memory structures. This vulnerability does not affect TCP/TLS connections. AST-2011-009: A remote user sending a SIP packet containing a Contact header with a missing left angle bracket causes Asterisk to access a NULL pointer. AST-2011-010: A memory address was inadvertently transmitted over the network via IAX2 via an option control frame and the remote party would try to access it. Possible enumeration of SIP users due to differing authentication responses.
    last seen2020-06-01
    modified2020-06-02
    plugin id55430
    published2011-06-27
    reporterThis script is Copyright (C) 2011-2019 and is owned by Tenable, Inc. or an Affiliate thereof.
    sourcehttps://www.tenable.com/plugins/nessus/55430
    titleFreeBSD : Asterisk -- multiple vulnerabilities (40544e8c-9f7b-11e0-9bec-6c626dd55a41)
  • NASL familyFedora Local Security Checks
    NASL idFEDORA_2011-8914.NASL
    descriptionThe Asterisk Development Team has announced the final maintenance release of Asterisk, version 1.6.2.19. This release is available for immediate download at http://downloads.asterisk.org/pub/telephony/asterisk/ Please note that Asterisk 1.6.2.19 is the final maintenance release from the 1.6.2 branch. Support for security related issues will continue until April 21, 2012. For more information about support of the various Asterisk branches, see https://wiki.asterisk.org/wiki/display/AST/Asterisk+Versions The release of Asterisk 1.6.2.19 resolves several issues reported by the community and would have not been possible without your participation. Thank you! The following is a sample of the issues resolved in this release : - Don
    last seen2020-06-01
    modified2020-06-02
    plugin id55581
    published2011-07-13
    reporterThis script is Copyright (C) 2011-2019 and is owned by Tenable, Inc. or an Affiliate thereof.
    sourcehttps://www.tenable.com/plugins/nessus/55581
    titleFedora 14 : asterisk-1.6.2.19-1.fc14 (2011-8914)
  • NASL familyDebian Local Security Checks
    NASL idDEBIAN_DSA-2276.NASL
    descriptionPaul Belanger reported a vulnerability in Asterisk identified as AST-2011-008(CVE-2011-2529 ) through which an unauthenticated attacker may crash an Asterisk server remotely. A package containing a NULL char causes the SIP header parser to alter unrelated memory structures. Jared Mauch reported a vulnerability in Asterisk identified as AST-2011-009through which an unauthenticated attacker may crash an Asterisk server remotely. If a user sends a package with a Contact header with a missing left angle bracket (<) the server will crash. A possible workaround is to disable chan_sip. The vulnerability identified as AST-2011-010(CVE-2011-2535 ) reported about an input validation error in the IAX2 channel driver. An unauthenticated attacker may crash an Asterisk server remotely by sending a crafted option control frame.
    last seen2020-03-17
    modified2011-07-12
    plugin id55554
    published2011-07-12
    reporterThis script is Copyright (C) 2011-2020 and is owned by Tenable, Inc. or an Affiliate thereof.
    sourcehttps://www.tenable.com/plugins/nessus/55554
    titleDebian DSA-2276-1 : asterisk - multiple denial of service