Vulnerabilities > CVE-2011-1687 - Information Exposure vulnerability in Bestpractical RT
Attack vector
UNKNOWN Attack complexity
UNKNOWN Privileges required
UNKNOWN Confidentiality impact
UNKNOWN Integrity impact
UNKNOWN Availability impact
UNKNOWN Summary
Best Practical Solutions RT 3.0.0 through 3.6.10, 3.8.0 through 3.8.9, and 4.0.0rc through 4.0.0rc7 allows remote authenticated users to obtain sensitive information by using the search interface, as demonstrated by retrieving encrypted passwords.
Vulnerable Configurations
Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE)
Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification (CAPEC)
- Subverting Environment Variable Values The attacker directly or indirectly modifies environment variables used by or controlling the target software. The attacker's goal is to cause the target software to deviate from its expected operation in a manner that benefits the attacker.
- Footprinting An attacker engages in probing and exploration activity to identify constituents and properties of the target. Footprinting is a general term to describe a variety of information gathering techniques, often used by attackers in preparation for some attack. It consists of using tools to learn as much as possible about the composition, configuration, and security mechanisms of the targeted application, system or network. Information that might be collected during a footprinting effort could include open ports, applications and their versions, network topology, and similar information. While footprinting is not intended to be damaging (although certain activities, such as network scans, can sometimes cause disruptions to vulnerable applications inadvertently) it may often pave the way for more damaging attacks.
- Exploiting Trust in Client (aka Make the Client Invisible) An attack of this type exploits a programs' vulnerabilities in client/server communication channel authentication and data integrity. It leverages the implicit trust a server places in the client, or more importantly, that which the server believes is the client. An attacker executes this type of attack by placing themselves in the communication channel between client and server such that communication directly to the server is possible where the server believes it is communicating only with a valid client. There are numerous variations of this type of attack.
- Browser Fingerprinting An attacker carefully crafts small snippets of Java Script to efficiently detect the type of browser the potential victim is using. Many web-based attacks need prior knowledge of the web browser including the version of browser to ensure successful exploitation of a vulnerability. Having this knowledge allows an attacker to target the victim with attacks that specifically exploit known or zero day weaknesses in the type and version of the browser used by the victim. Automating this process via Java Script as a part of the same delivery system used to exploit the browser is considered more efficient as the attacker can supply a browser fingerprinting method and integrate it with exploit code, all contained in Java Script and in response to the same web page request by the browser.
- Session Credential Falsification through Prediction This attack targets predictable session ID in order to gain privileges. The attacker can predict the session ID used during a transaction to perform spoofing and session hijacking.
Nessus
NASL family Debian Local Security Checks NASL id DEBIAN_DSA-2220.NASL description Several vulnerabilities were discovered in Request Tracker, an issue tracking system. - CVE-2011-1685 If the external custom field feature is enabled, Request Tracker allows authenticated users to execute arbitrary code with the permissions of the web server, possible triggered by a cross-site request forgery attack. (External custom fields are disabled by default.) - CVE-2011-1686 Multiple SQL injection attacks allow authenticated users to obtain data from the database in an unauthorized way. - CVE-2011-1687 An information leak allows an authenticated privileged user to obtain sensitive information, such as encrypted passwords, via the search interface. - CVE-2011-1688 When running under certain web servers (such as Lighttpd), Request Tracker is vulnerable to a directory traversal attack, allowing attackers to read any files accessible to the web server. Request Tracker instances running under Apache or Nginx are not affected. - CVE-2011-1689 Request Tracker contains multiple cross-site scripting vulnerabilities. - CVE-2011-1690 Request Tracker enables attackers to redirect authentication credentials supplied by legitimate users to third-party servers. last seen 2020-03-17 modified 2011-04-20 plugin id 53495 published 2011-04-20 reporter This script is Copyright (C) 2011-2020 and is owned by Tenable, Inc. or an Affiliate thereof. source https://www.tenable.com/plugins/nessus/53495 title Debian DSA-2220-1 : request-tracker3.6, request-tracker3.8 - several vulnerabilities NASL family FreeBSD Local Security Checks NASL id FREEBSD_PKG_BF17150968DD11E0AFE60003BA02BF30.NASL description Best Practical reports : In the process of preparing the release of RT 4.0.0, we performed an extensive security audit of RT last seen 2020-06-01 modified 2020-06-02 plugin id 53470 published 2011-04-18 reporter This script is Copyright (C) 2011-2019 and is owned by Tenable, Inc. or an Affiliate thereof. source https://www.tenable.com/plugins/nessus/53470 title FreeBSD : rt -- multiple vulnerabilities (bf171509-68dd-11e0-afe6-0003ba02bf30)
References
- http://blog.bestpractical.com/2011/04/security-vulnerabilities-in-rt.html
- http://lists.bestpractical.com/pipermail/rt-announce/2011-April/000187.html
- http://lists.bestpractical.com/pipermail/rt-announce/2011-April/000188.html
- http://lists.bestpractical.com/pipermail/rt-announce/2011-April/000189.html
- http://secunia.com/advisories/44189
- http://www.debian.org/security/2011/dsa-2220
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/47383
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2011/1071
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=696795
- https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/66793
- http://blog.bestpractical.com/2011/04/security-vulnerabilities-in-rt.html
- https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/66793
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=696795
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2011/1071
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/47383
- http://www.debian.org/security/2011/dsa-2220
- http://secunia.com/advisories/44189
- http://lists.bestpractical.com/pipermail/rt-announce/2011-April/000189.html
- http://lists.bestpractical.com/pipermail/rt-announce/2011-April/000188.html
- http://lists.bestpractical.com/pipermail/rt-announce/2011-April/000187.html