Vulnerabilities > CVE-2010-3283 - Improper Input Validation vulnerability in HP System Management Homepage

047910
CVSS 4.3 - MEDIUM
Attack vector
NETWORK
Attack complexity
MEDIUM
Privileges required
NONE
Confidentiality impact
NONE
Integrity impact
PARTIAL
Availability impact
NONE
network
hp
CWE-20
nessus

Summary

Open redirect vulnerability in HP System Management Homepage (SMH) before 6.2 allows remote attackers to redirect users to arbitrary web sites and conduct phishing attacks via unspecified vectors.

Vulnerable Configurations

Part Description Count
Application
Hp
73

Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE)

Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification (CAPEC)

  • Buffer Overflow via Environment Variables
    This attack pattern involves causing a buffer overflow through manipulation of environment variables. Once the attacker finds that they can modify an environment variable, they may try to overflow associated buffers. This attack leverages implicit trust often placed in environment variables.
  • Server Side Include (SSI) Injection
    An attacker can use Server Side Include (SSI) Injection to send code to a web application that then gets executed by the web server. Doing so enables the attacker to achieve similar results to Cross Site Scripting, viz., arbitrary code execution and information disclosure, albeit on a more limited scale, since the SSI directives are nowhere near as powerful as a full-fledged scripting language. Nonetheless, the attacker can conveniently gain access to sensitive files, such as password files, and execute shell commands.
  • Cross Zone Scripting
    An attacker is able to cause a victim to load content into their web-browser that bypasses security zone controls and gain access to increased privileges to execute scripting code or other web objects such as unsigned ActiveX controls or applets. This is a privilege elevation attack targeted at zone-based web-browser security. In a zone-based model, pages belong to one of a set of zones corresponding to the level of privilege assigned to that page. Pages in an untrusted zone would have a lesser level of access to the system and/or be restricted in the types of executable content it was allowed to invoke. In a cross-zone scripting attack, a page that should be assigned to a less privileged zone is granted the privileges of a more trusted zone. This can be accomplished by exploiting bugs in the browser, exploiting incorrect configuration in the zone controls, through a cross-site scripting attack that causes the attackers' content to be treated as coming from a more trusted page, or by leveraging some piece of system functionality that is accessible from both the trusted and less trusted zone. This attack differs from "Restful Privilege Escalation" in that the latter correlates to the inadequate securing of RESTful access methods (such as HTTP DELETE) on the server, while cross-zone scripting attacks the concept of security zones as implemented by a browser.
  • Cross Site Scripting through Log Files
    An attacker may leverage a system weakness where logs are susceptible to log injection to insert scripts into the system's logs. If these logs are later viewed by an administrator through a thin administrative interface and the log data is not properly HTML encoded before being written to the page, the attackers' scripts stored in the log will be executed in the administrative interface with potentially serious consequences. This attack pattern is really a combination of two other attack patterns: log injection and stored cross site scripting.
  • Command Line Execution through SQL Injection
    An attacker uses standard SQL injection methods to inject data into the command line for execution. This could be done directly through misuse of directives such as MSSQL_xp_cmdshell or indirectly through injection of data into the database that would be interpreted as shell commands. Sometime later, an unscrupulous backend application (or could be part of the functionality of the same application) fetches the injected data stored in the database and uses this data as command line arguments without performing proper validation. The malicious data escapes that data plane by spawning new commands to be executed on the host.

Nessus

NASL familyWeb Servers
NASL idHPSMH_6_2_0_12.NASL
descriptionAccording to its self-reported version number, the HP System Management Homepage install on the remote host is earlier than 6.2. Such versions are reportedly affected by the following vulnerabilities : - Session renegotiations are not handled properly, which could be exploited to insert arbitrary plaintext in a man-in-the-middle attack. (CVE-2009-3555) - An attacker may be able to upload files using a POST request with
last seen2020-06-01
modified2020-06-02
plugin id49272
published2010-09-17
reporterThis script is Copyright (C) 2010-2018 Tenable Network Security, Inc.
sourcehttps://www.tenable.com/plugins/nessus/49272
titleHP System Management Homepage < 6.2 Multiple Vulnerabilities
code
#
# (C) Tenable Network Security, Inc.
#


include("compat.inc");


if (description)
{
  script_id(49272);
  script_version("1.23");
  script_cvs_date("Date: 2018/11/15 20:50:25");

  script_cve_id(
    "CVE-2009-3555",
    "CVE-2009-4017",
    "CVE-2009-4018",
    "CVE-2009-4143",
    "CVE-2010-1586",
    "CVE-2010-2068",
    "CVE-2010-3009",
    "CVE-2010-3011",
    "CVE-2010-3012",
    "CVE-2010-3283",
    "CVE-2010-3284"
  );
  script_bugtraq_id(
    36935,
    37079,
    37138,
    37390,
    43208,
    43269,
    43334,
    43423,
    43462,
    43463
  );

  script_name(english:"HP System Management Homepage < 6.2 Multiple Vulnerabilities");
  script_summary(english:"Does a banner check");

  script_set_attribute(attribute:"synopsis", value:"The remote web server is affected by multiple vulnerabilities.");
  script_set_attribute(
    attribute:"description",
    value:
"According to its self-reported version number, the HP System
Management Homepage install on the remote host is earlier than 6.2.
Such versions are reportedly affected by the following
vulnerabilities :

  - Session renegotiations are not handled properly, which
    could be exploited to insert arbitrary plaintext in a
    man-in-the-middle attack. (CVE-2009-3555)

  - An attacker may be able to upload files using a POST
    request with 'multipart/form-data' content even if the
    target script doesn't actually support file uploads per
    se. (CVE-2009-4017)

  - PHP's 'proc_open' function can be abused to bypass
    'safe_mode_allowed_env_vars' and
    'safe_mode_protected_env_vars' directives.
    (CVE-2009-4018)

  - PHP does not properly protect session data as relates
    to interrupt corruption of '$_SESSION' and the
    'session.save_path' directive. (CVE-2009-4143)

  - The application allows arbitrary URL redirections.
    (CVE-2010-1586 and CVE-2010-3283)

  - An information disclosure vulnerability exists in
    Apache's mod_proxy_ajp, mod_reqtimeout, and
    mod_proxy_http relating to timeout conditions. Note
    that this issue only affects SMH on Windows.
    (CVE-2010-2068)

  - An as-yet unspecified information disclosure
    vulnerability may allow an authorized user to gain
    access to sensitive information, which in turn could
    be leveraged to obtain root access on Linux installs
    of SMH. (CVE-2010-3009)

  - There is an as-yet unspecified HTTP response splitting
    issue. (CVE-2010-3011)

  - There is an as-yet unspecified cross-site scripting
    issue. (CVE-2010-3012)

  - An as-yet unspecified vulnerability could lead to
    remote disclosure of sensitive information.
    (CVE-2010-3284)"
  );
  script_set_attribute(attribute:"see_also", value:"https://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/513684/30/0/threaded");
  script_set_attribute(
    attribute:"see_also",
    value:"https://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/513771/30/0/threaded"
  );
  script_set_attribute(
    attribute:"see_also",
    value:"https://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/513840/30/0/threaded"
  );
  script_set_attribute(
    attribute:"see_also",
    value:"https://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/513917/30/0/threaded"
  );
  script_set_attribute(
    attribute:"see_also",
    value:"https://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/513918/30/0/threaded"
  );
  script_set_attribute(
    attribute:"see_also",
    value:"https://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/513920/30/0/threaded"
  );
  script_set_attribute(attribute:"solution", value:"Upgrade to HP System Management Homepage 6.2.0 or later.");
  script_set_cvss_base_vector("CVSS2#AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C");
  script_set_cvss_temporal_vector("CVSS2#E:POC/RL:OF/RC:C");
  script_set_attribute(attribute:"exploitability_ease", value:"Exploits are available");
  script_set_attribute(attribute:"exploit_available", value:"true");
  script_cwe_id(264, 310);

  script_set_attribute(attribute:"vuln_publication_date", value:"2009/07/23");
  script_set_attribute(attribute:"patch_publication_date", value:"2010/08/25");
  script_set_attribute(attribute:"plugin_publication_date", value:"2010/09/17");

  script_set_attribute(attribute:"plugin_type", value:"remote");
  script_set_attribute(attribute:"cpe", value:"cpe:/a:hp:system_management_homepage");
  script_end_attributes();

  script_category(ACT_GATHER_INFO);
  script_family(english:"Web Servers");

  script_copyright(english:"This script is Copyright (C) 2010-2018 Tenable Network Security, Inc.");

  script_dependencies("compaq_wbem_detect.nasl");
  script_require_keys("www/hp_smh");
  script_require_ports("Services/www", 2301, 2381);

  exit(0);
}


include("audit.inc");
include("global_settings.inc");
include("misc_func.inc");
include("http.inc");
include("webapp_func.inc");


port = get_http_port(default:2381, embedded:TRUE);


install = get_install_from_kb(appname:'hp_smh', port:port, exit_on_fail:TRUE);
dir = install['dir'];
version = install['ver'];
prod = get_kb_item_or_exit("www/"+port+"/hp_smh/variant");
if (version == UNKNOWN_VER)
  exit(1, 'The version of '+prod+' installed at '+build_url(port:port, qs:dir+"/")+' is unknown.');

# nb: 'version' can have non-numeric characters in it so we'll create
#     an alternate form and make sure that's safe for use in 'ver_compare()'.
version_alt = ereg_replace(pattern:"[_-]", replace:".", string:version);
if (!ereg(pattern:"^[0-9][0-9.]+$", string:version_alt))
  exit(1, 'The version of '+prod+' installed at '+build_url(port:port, qs:dir+"/")+' does not look valid ('+version+').');

# NB: while 6.2.0.12 is the fix for Linux and 6.2.0.13 is the fix for
#     Windows, there is no way to infer OS from the banner. Since
#     there is no 6.2.0.12 publicly released for Windows, this check
#     should be "Good Enough".
fixed_version = '6.2.0.12';

if (ver_compare(ver:version_alt, fix:fixed_version, strict:FALSE) == -1)
{
  if (report_verbosity > 0)
  {
    source_line = get_kb_item("www/"+port+"/hp_smh/source");

    report = '\n  Product           : ' + prod;
    if (!isnull(source_line))
      report += '\n  Version source    : ' + source_line;
    report +=
      '\n  Installed version : ' + version +
      '\n  Fixed version     : ' + fixed_version + '\n';
    security_hole(port:port, extra:report);
  }
  else security_hole(port);

  exit(0);
}
else exit(0, prod+" "+version+" is listening on port "+port+" and is not affected.");

Packetstorm

data sourcehttps://packetstormsecurity.com/files/download/101636/PR10-11.txt
idPACKETSTORM:101636
last seen2016-12-05
published2011-05-24
reporterProCheckUp
sourcehttps://packetstormsecurity.com/files/101636/HP-System-Management-Homepage-Cross-Site-Scripting.html
titleHP System Management Homepage Cross Site Scripting