Vulnerabilities > CVE-2009-1282 - SQL Injection vulnerability in Glfusion

047910
CVSS 7.5 - HIGH
Attack vector
NETWORK
Attack complexity
LOW
Privileges required
NONE
Confidentiality impact
PARTIAL
Integrity impact
PARTIAL
Availability impact
PARTIAL
network
low complexity
glfusion
CWE-89
exploit available

Summary

SQL injection vulnerability in private/system/lib-session.php in glFusion 1.1.2 and earlier allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the glf_session cookie parameter.

Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification (CAPEC)

  • Command Line Execution through SQL Injection
    An attacker uses standard SQL injection methods to inject data into the command line for execution. This could be done directly through misuse of directives such as MSSQL_xp_cmdshell or indirectly through injection of data into the database that would be interpreted as shell commands. Sometime later, an unscrupulous backend application (or could be part of the functionality of the same application) fetches the injected data stored in the database and uses this data as command line arguments without performing proper validation. The malicious data escapes that data plane by spawning new commands to be executed on the host.
  • Object Relational Mapping Injection
    An attacker leverages a weakness present in the database access layer code generated with an Object Relational Mapping (ORM) tool or a weakness in the way that a developer used a persistence framework to inject his or her own SQL commands to be executed against the underlying database. The attack here is similar to plain SQL injection, except that the application does not use JDBC to directly talk to the database, but instead it uses a data access layer generated by an ORM tool or framework (e.g. Hibernate). While most of the time code generated by an ORM tool contains safe access methods that are immune to SQL injection, sometimes either due to some weakness in the generated code or due to the fact that the developer failed to use the generated access methods properly, SQL injection is still possible.
  • SQL Injection through SOAP Parameter Tampering
    An attacker modifies the parameters of the SOAP message that is sent from the service consumer to the service provider to initiate a SQL injection attack. On the service provider side, the SOAP message is parsed and parameters are not properly validated before being used to access a database in a way that does not use parameter binding, thus enabling the attacker to control the structure of the executed SQL query. This pattern describes a SQL injection attack with the delivery mechanism being a SOAP message.
  • Expanding Control over the Operating System from the Database
    An attacker is able to leverage access gained to the database to read / write data to the file system, compromise the operating system, create a tunnel for accessing the host machine, and use this access to potentially attack other machines on the same network as the database machine. Traditionally SQL injections attacks are viewed as a way to gain unauthorized read access to the data stored in the database, modify the data in the database, delete the data, etc. However, almost every data base management system (DBMS) system includes facilities that if compromised allow an attacker complete access to the file system, operating system, and full access to the host running the database. The attacker can then use this privileged access to launch subsequent attacks. These facilities include dropping into a command shell, creating user defined functions that can call system level libraries present on the host machine, stored procedures, etc.
  • SQL Injection
    This attack exploits target software that constructs SQL statements based on user input. An attacker crafts input strings so that when the target software constructs SQL statements based on the input, the resulting SQL statement performs actions other than those the application intended. SQL Injection results from failure of the application to appropriately validate input. When specially crafted user-controlled input consisting of SQL syntax is used without proper validation as part of SQL queries, it is possible to glean information from the database in ways not envisaged during application design. Depending upon the database and the design of the application, it may also be possible to leverage injection to have the database execute system-related commands of the attackers' choice. SQL Injection enables an attacker to talk directly to the database, thus bypassing the application completely. Successful injection can cause information disclosure as well as ability to add or modify data in the database. In order to successfully inject SQL and retrieve information from a database, an attacker:

Exploit-Db

descriptionglFusion <= 1.1.2 COM_applyFilter()/cookies Blind SQL Injection Exploit. CVE-2009-1281,CVE-2009-1282,CVE-2009-1283. Webapps exploit for php platform
fileexploits/php/webapps/8347.php
idEDB-ID:8347
last seen2016-02-01
modified2009-04-03
platformphp
port
published2009-04-03
reporterNine:Situations:Group
sourcehttps://www.exploit-db.com/download/8347/
titleglFusion <= 1.1.2 COM_applyFilter/cookies Blind SQL Injection Exploit
typewebapps

Seebug

bulletinFamilyexploit
descriptionBUGTRAQ ID: 34361 CVE(CAN) ID: CVE-2009-1282,CVE-2009-1283 glFusion是一个开源的内容管理系统。 glFusion的private/system/lib-session.php模块没有正确地过滤用户所提交的glf_session cookie参数,远程攻击者可以通过向服务器提交恶意请求执行SQL注入攻击。以下是/private/system/lib-session.php 的97-117行的有漏洞代码段: ... if (isset ($_COOKIE[$_CONF['cookie_session']])) { $sessid = COM_applyFilter ($_COOKIE[$_CONF['cookie_session']]); if ($_SESS_VERBOSE) { COM_errorLog(&quot;got $sessid as the session id from lib-sessions.php&quot;,1); } $userid = SESS_getUserIdFromSession($sessid, $_CONF['session_cookie_timeout'], $_SERVER['REMOTE_ADDR'], $_CONF['cookie_ip']); if ($_SESS_VERBOSE) { COM_errorLog(&quot;Got $userid as User ID from the session ID&quot;,1); } if ($userid &gt; 1) { // Check user status $status = SEC_checkUserStatus($userid); if (($status == USER_ACCOUNT_ACTIVE) || ($status == USER_ACCOUNT_AWAITING_ACTIVATION)) { $user_logged_in = 1; SESS_updateSessionTime($sessid, $_CONF['cookie_ip']); 在418-436行的SESS_updateSessionTime()函数中: ... function SESS_updateSessionTime($sessid, $md5_based=0) { global $_TABLES; $newtime = (string) time(); if ($md5_based == 1) { $sql = &quot;UPDATE {$_TABLES['sessions']} SET start_time=$newtime WHERE (md5_sess_id = '$sessid')&quot;; } else { $sql = &quot;UPDATE {$_TABLES['sessions']} SET start_time=$newtime WHERE (sess_id = $sessid)&quot;; //&lt;-------- SQL INJECTION HERE } $result = DB_query($sql); return 1; } ... 如果在通用配置中会话id不是md5()哈希(默认配置),就可以注入SQL语句。 在SESS_getUserIdFromSession()函数的查询中: ... if ($md5_based == 1) { $sql = &quot;SELECT uid FROM {$_TABLES['sessions']} WHERE &quot; . &quot;(md5_sess_id = '$sessid') AND (start_time &gt; $mintime) AND (remote_ip = '$remote_ip')&quot;; } else { $sql = &quot;SELECT uid FROM {$_TABLES['sessions']} WHERE &quot; . &quot;(sess_id = '$sessid') AND (start_time &gt; $mintime) AND (remote_ip = '$remote_ip')&quot;; } ... 这个查询将所提供的sessid值与从会话表中的sessid值(整数)做了比较,而在比较时仅考虑了字符串的第一个整数值,因此函数返回了有效的userid。如果知道了表格中已有的sessid的话,就可以如下在cookie中注入查询: Cookie: glf_session=12345678 [SQL HERE]; glfusion=9999999999; glFusion &lt;= 1.1.2 glFusion -------- 目前厂商已经发布了升级补丁以修复这个安全问题,请到厂商的主页下载: <a href=http://www.glfusion.org/filemgmt/visit.php?lid=275 target=_blank rel=external nofollow>http://www.glfusion.org/filemgmt/visit.php?lid=275</a>
idSSV:5032
last seen2017-11-19
modified2009-04-11
published2009-04-11
reporterRoot
sourcehttps://www.seebug.org/vuldb/ssvid-5032
titleglFusion lib-session.php模块SQL注入漏洞