Vulnerabilities > CVE-2008-1331 - Improper Input Validation vulnerability in Alcatel-Lucent Omnipcx Office

Attack vector
Attack complexity
Privileges required
Confidentiality impact
Integrity impact
Availability impact
low complexity
exploit available


cgi-data/FastJSData.cgi in OmniPCX Office with Internet Access services OXO210 before 210/091.001, OXO600 before 610/014.001, and other versions, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands and "obtain OXO resources" via shell metacharacters in the id2 parameter.

Vulnerable Configurations

Part Description Count

Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE)

Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification (CAPEC)

  • Buffer Overflow via Environment Variables
    This attack pattern involves causing a buffer overflow through manipulation of environment variables. Once the attacker finds that they can modify an environment variable, they may try to overflow associated buffers. This attack leverages implicit trust often placed in environment variables.
  • Server Side Include (SSI) Injection
    An attacker can use Server Side Include (SSI) Injection to send code to a web application that then gets executed by the web server. Doing so enables the attacker to achieve similar results to Cross Site Scripting, viz., arbitrary code execution and information disclosure, albeit on a more limited scale, since the SSI directives are nowhere near as powerful as a full-fledged scripting language. Nonetheless, the attacker can conveniently gain access to sensitive files, such as password files, and execute shell commands.
  • Cross Zone Scripting
    An attacker is able to cause a victim to load content into their web-browser that bypasses security zone controls and gain access to increased privileges to execute scripting code or other web objects such as unsigned ActiveX controls or applets. This is a privilege elevation attack targeted at zone-based web-browser security. In a zone-based model, pages belong to one of a set of zones corresponding to the level of privilege assigned to that page. Pages in an untrusted zone would have a lesser level of access to the system and/or be restricted in the types of executable content it was allowed to invoke. In a cross-zone scripting attack, a page that should be assigned to a less privileged zone is granted the privileges of a more trusted zone. This can be accomplished by exploiting bugs in the browser, exploiting incorrect configuration in the zone controls, through a cross-site scripting attack that causes the attackers' content to be treated as coming from a more trusted page, or by leveraging some piece of system functionality that is accessible from both the trusted and less trusted zone. This attack differs from "Restful Privilege Escalation" in that the latter correlates to the inadequate securing of RESTful access methods (such as HTTP DELETE) on the server, while cross-zone scripting attacks the concept of security zones as implemented by a browser.
  • Cross Site Scripting through Log Files
    An attacker may leverage a system weakness where logs are susceptible to log injection to insert scripts into the system's logs. If these logs are later viewed by an administrator through a thin administrative interface and the log data is not properly HTML encoded before being written to the page, the attackers' scripts stored in the log will be executed in the administrative interface with potentially serious consequences. This attack pattern is really a combination of two other attack patterns: log injection and stored cross site scripting.
  • Command Line Execution through SQL Injection
    An attacker uses standard SQL injection methods to inject data into the command line for execution. This could be done directly through misuse of directives such as MSSQL_xp_cmdshell or indirectly through injection of data into the database that would be interpreted as shell commands. Sometime later, an unscrupulous backend application (or could be part of the functionality of the same application) fetches the injected data stored in the database and uses this data as command line arguments without performing proper validation. The malicious data escapes that data plane by spawning new commands to be executed on the host.




descriptionBUGTRAQ ID: 28758 CVE(CAN) ID: CVE-2008-1331 阿尔卡特的OmniPCX Office是一套为中小型企业设计的统一通信解决方案。 OmniPCX Office的Internet Access服务所使用的一个CGI脚本没有正确地过滤某些特定参数,允许远程攻击者从Internet检索敏感信息。 Alcatel-Lucent OmniPCX Office &gt;= 210/061.1 临时解决方法: 如果您不能立刻安装补丁或者升级,NSFOCUS建议您采取以下措施以降低威胁: * 禁止从Internet的WBM/WCA访问 对于R2.1到R4.1版本: 以管理帐号登录到WBM 找到Firewall配置屏幕 选择Firewall Settings URL 选择Services标签 反选Web-Based Management (WBM) 反选Web-Communication Assistant 应用修改 注销 对于R5.1到R6.1版本: 以管理帐号登录到WBM 找到Firewall配置屏幕 选择Firewall Settings URL 选择HTTP/HTTPS标签 反选HTTPS services (“Services available from WAN network using HTTPS”) 反选HTTP services (“Services available from WAN network using HTTP”) 应用修改 注销 厂商补丁: Alcatel-Lucent -------------- 目前厂商已经发布了升级补丁以修复这个安全问题,请到厂商的主页下载: <a href= target=_blank></a>
last seen2017-11-19
titleOmniPCX Office远程信息泄露漏洞