Vulnerabilities > CVE-2008-0406 - Improper Input Validation vulnerability in HFS Http File Server

047910
CVSS 5.0 - MEDIUM
Attack vector
NETWORK
Attack complexity
LOW
Privileges required
NONE
Confidentiality impact
NONE
Integrity impact
NONE
Availability impact
PARTIAL
network
low complexity
hfs
CWE-20
exploit available

Summary

HTTP File Server (HFS) before 2.2c, when account names are used as log filenames, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon crash) via a long account name.

Vulnerable Configurations

Part Description Count
Application
Hfs
1

Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE)

Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification (CAPEC)

  • Buffer Overflow via Environment Variables
    This attack pattern involves causing a buffer overflow through manipulation of environment variables. Once the attacker finds that they can modify an environment variable, they may try to overflow associated buffers. This attack leverages implicit trust often placed in environment variables.
  • Server Side Include (SSI) Injection
    An attacker can use Server Side Include (SSI) Injection to send code to a web application that then gets executed by the web server. Doing so enables the attacker to achieve similar results to Cross Site Scripting, viz., arbitrary code execution and information disclosure, albeit on a more limited scale, since the SSI directives are nowhere near as powerful as a full-fledged scripting language. Nonetheless, the attacker can conveniently gain access to sensitive files, such as password files, and execute shell commands.
  • Cross Zone Scripting
    An attacker is able to cause a victim to load content into their web-browser that bypasses security zone controls and gain access to increased privileges to execute scripting code or other web objects such as unsigned ActiveX controls or applets. This is a privilege elevation attack targeted at zone-based web-browser security. In a zone-based model, pages belong to one of a set of zones corresponding to the level of privilege assigned to that page. Pages in an untrusted zone would have a lesser level of access to the system and/or be restricted in the types of executable content it was allowed to invoke. In a cross-zone scripting attack, a page that should be assigned to a less privileged zone is granted the privileges of a more trusted zone. This can be accomplished by exploiting bugs in the browser, exploiting incorrect configuration in the zone controls, through a cross-site scripting attack that causes the attackers' content to be treated as coming from a more trusted page, or by leveraging some piece of system functionality that is accessible from both the trusted and less trusted zone. This attack differs from "Restful Privilege Escalation" in that the latter correlates to the inadequate securing of RESTful access methods (such as HTTP DELETE) on the server, while cross-zone scripting attacks the concept of security zones as implemented by a browser.
  • Cross Site Scripting through Log Files
    An attacker may leverage a system weakness where logs are susceptible to log injection to insert scripts into the system's logs. If these logs are later viewed by an administrator through a thin administrative interface and the log data is not properly HTML encoded before being written to the page, the attackers' scripts stored in the log will be executed in the administrative interface with potentially serious consequences. This attack pattern is really a combination of two other attack patterns: log injection and stored cross site scripting.
  • Command Line Execution through SQL Injection
    An attacker uses standard SQL injection methods to inject data into the command line for execution. This could be done directly through misuse of directives such as MSSQL_xp_cmdshell or indirectly through injection of data into the database that would be interpreted as shell commands. Sometime later, an unscrupulous backend application (or could be part of the functionality of the same application) fetches the injected data stored in the database and uses this data as command line arguments without performing proper validation. The malicious data escapes that data plane by spawning new commands to be executed on the host.

Exploit-Db

descriptionHFS HTTP File Server 1.5/2.x Multiple Security Vulnerabilities. CVE-2008-0406. Remote exploit for windows platform
idEDB-ID:31056
last seen2016-02-03
modified2008-01-23
published2008-01-23
reporterFelipe M. Aragon
sourcehttps://www.exploit-db.com/download/31056/
titleRejetto HTTP File Server HFS 1.5/2.x - Multiple Security Vulnerabilities

Packetstorm

data sourcehttps://packetstormsecurity.com/files/download/62932/hfshack.txt
idPACKETSTORM:62932
last seen2016-12-05
published2008-01-24
reporterFelipe Daragon
sourcehttps://packetstormsecurity.com/files/62932/hfshack.txt.html
titlehfshack.txt

Seebug

  • bulletinFamilyexploit
    descriptionNo description provided by source.
    idSSV:84409
    last seen2017-11-19
    modified2014-07-01
    published2014-07-01
    reporterRoot
    sourcehttps://www.seebug.org/vuldb/ssvid-84409
    titleHFS HTTP File Server 1.5/2.x Multiple Security Vulnerabilities
  • bulletinFamilyexploit
    descriptionBUGTRAQ ID: 27423 CVE(CAN) ID: CVE-2008-0405,CVE-2008-0406,CVE-2008-0407,CVE-2008-0408,CVE-2008-0409,CVE-2008-0410 HTTP File Server是用于共享文件的开源HTTP服务器。 HFS没有正确地记录某些输入,用户可以在登陆时伪造用户名将任意内容注入到日志文件中。 HFS没有正确地过滤某些输入便将其返回给了用户,这可能导致在受影响服务器的用户浏览器会话中执行任意HTML和脚本代码。 远程攻击者可以通过向服务器提交包含有模板符号的特制请求导致泄露某些信息,如连接数、传输速度、通讯统计或运行时间等。 HFS没有正确地处理用户名便使用用户名创建日志文件的文件名,这可能允许攻击者通过向服务器提交恶意请求导致创建目录、向文件附加数据,或触发缓冲区溢出。成功攻击允许执行任意代码,但要求使用了%user%模板符号定义日志文件的名称。 HFS HTTP File Server 1.5g - 2.3(Beta Build#174) HFS --- 目前厂商已经发布了升级补丁以修复这个安全问题,请到厂商的主页下载: <a href=http://downloads.sourceforge.net/hfs/hfs2.2c.zip?modtime=1201107806&amp;big_mirror=0 target=_blank>http://downloads.sourceforge.net/hfs/hfs2.2c.zip?modtime=1201107806&amp;big_mirror=0</a>
    idSSV:2868
    last seen2017-11-19
    modified2008-01-26
    published2008-01-26
    reporterRoot
    sourcehttps://www.seebug.org/vuldb/ssvid-2868
    titleHFS HTTP File Server多个远程安全漏洞